Church

Pastors and deacons are the primary offices in the New Testament Church.

We also find words for elder (presbuteros), and for bishop or overseer (episkopos). Pastor is the Greek poimen, which is also translated shepherd. Despite the fact various groups have created different offices for these terms, in the New Testament they are synonymous: Pastor = elder = bishop or overseer. (See Acts 20:17,28.) All of these terms refer to an individual who shepherds people, cares for a flock, and is a spiritual leader.

There can be multiple elders in a church. Pastors/elders lead, some paid and some unpaid, and some also preach and teach. First Timothy 5:17 says, “Let the elders who rule well be counted worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in the word and doctrine.” “Double honor” refers to wages, or income from the ministry (v. 18).

Read Full Post »

Did Jesus have a brother?

Categories: Church, Christology, Jesus, Bible | October 27th, 2008 | by Ken Horn | no comments

Jesus had four half-brothers as well as half-sisters:

Coming to his hometown, he began teaching the people in their synagogue, and they were amazed. “Where did this man get this wisdom and these miraculous powers?” they asked. “Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother’s name Mary, and aren’t his brothers James, Joseph, Simon and Judas? Aren’t all his sisters with us? Where then did this man get all these things?” Matthew 13:54-56 (see Mark 6:3)

His brother James is the likely author of the book of James and the leader of the new church in the book of Acts (see chapter 15).

Ken Horn

Read Full Post »

Women in Ministry?

Categories: women, Church, Pentecost, pastors, Bible | March 27th, 2008 | by Ken Horn | one comments

Where does the Pentecostal church stand on women preachers/teachers?

One of the great privileges I have had since I have been with Today’s Pentecostal Evangel is the international travel that is a part of our coverage for the World Missions Edition of the magazine. In viewing the works of God among His people on five continents, one of the things that stand out to me is this: Wherever there is a powerful move of God, I have seen women actively and significantly involved. In some places it has been clear that without the ministry of women the church would not be experiencing the spiritual prosperity it is. This is clearly the case in the world’s largest church, Yoido Full Gospel Church, in Seoul, South Korea.

The story of women in missions is more than that of female nationals. A glance at both the history of missions and current missions outreach proves that the ministry of female missionaries, single and married, is of inestimable value. The history of Pentecost also reveals the crucial role women have played, and continue to play, in the movement.

But more than experience speaks for the importance of women. So does God’s Word. Though the role of women in the church has been a hotly debated topic for many years, it is clear that Christianity has always valued women more highly than other worldviews have. In the gospels, Jesus clearly elevated the status of women above that day’s cultural norm. The apostle Paul continued to promote that reality in the epistles he wrote. His statement in Galatians 3:28 is the biblical magnum opus of male/female spiritual equality: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (NIV). And though it was Paul who said, “Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord” (Ephesians 5:22), his statement (often ignored) about husband/wife relationship in the verse just prior to that was trailblazing: “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.”

The Assemblies of God, based on the teaching of God’s Word and not simply on experience, has come to the following conclusion:

We are aware that the ministry and leadership of women are not accepted by some individuals, both within and outside the Christian community. We condemn all prejudice and self-promotion, by men or women. The existence in the secular world of bigotry against women cannot be denied. But there is no place for such an attitude in the body of Christ. We acknowledge that attitudes of secular society, based on long-standing practice and tradition, have influenced the application of biblical principles to local circumstances. We desire wisely to respect yet help redeem cultures which are at variance with Kingdom principles. Like Paul, we affirm the Great Commission takes priority over every other consideration. We must reach men and women for Christ, no matter what their cultural or ethnic customs may be. The message of redemption has been carried to remote parts of the world through the ministry of dedicated, Spirit-filled men and women. A believer’s gifts and anointing should still today make a way for his or her ministry. The Pentecostal ministry is not a profession to which men or women merely aspire; it must always be a divine calling, confirmed by the Spirit with a special gifting.

The Assemblies of God has been blessed and must continue to be blessed by the ministry of God’s gifted and commissioned daughters. To the degree that we are convinced of our Pentecostal distinctives–that it is God who divinely calls and supernaturally anoints for ministry–we must continue to be open to the full use of women’s gifts in ministry and spiritual leadership.

Read the full position paper here.

Ken Horn

Read Full Post »

I have heard that the Second Coming of Christ is divided into two stages. Is this true and, if so, what are they?

The Second Coming of Christ in evangelical theology is often divided into 2 phases: (1) the Second Coming for the Church (the Rapture); (2) the Second Coming to reign.

The Blessed Hope of the Church is clearly the Rapture (see Titus 2:13). Assemblies of God theologians see this as the first phase of the Second Coming. The Assemblies of God perspective is presented in this excerpt from Bible Doctrines by William W. Menzies and Stanley M. Horton:

The definition of the term “Second Coming” is broad, used in at least two different ways. Sometimes this term is used of the total end-time drama, encompassing both the rapture of the Church and the revelation of Christ in triumphant glory (2 Thessalonians 1:7), when He will stand on the Mount of Olives (Zechariah 14:4). Sometimes the term is used specifically of the revelation of Christ, in distinction to the Rapture, which precedes it. The first phase of the Second Coming, then, used in this broader sense, refers to the rapture of the Church.

William W. Menzies and Stanley M. Horton, Bible Doctrines (Springfield, MO: Gospel Publishing House, 1993), p. 216.

Ken Horn

Read Full Post »

Should we rename the Assemblies of God?

Categories: Church, ecclesiology, Christianity | February 7th, 2008 | by Ken Horn | 2 comments

I have heard that AG churches should not have religious sounding names. Is this true,and if so, why are we doing this? Should we rename the Assemblies Of God?

Editor’s note: This is an editorial response since there is no straight biblical answer on the topic.

One of the goals of the church is to reach the unsaved and the unchurched. To this end, many pastors and congregations have opted for names that they feel are more inviting to the general populace. In the ’60s and ’70s, there was a movement away from the then typical names: “First Assembly of God,” etc. Many churches became “Christian Center” or something similar. AG churches used to use the word “Temple” a lot. That gave way to “Community Church,” etc. Today, even many of the biggest seeker-sensitive churches use the word “Church” in their name, along with a descriptive word of the location. A few churches have gone to names that do not incorporate anything religious.

I don’t have a beef with anybody’s name. What I do have a problem with is when a church is trying to “trick” people with their name or lack of full disclosure. I don’t believe the name “Assemblies of God” needs to be in the title of a local AG church. But I have seen AG churches that try to keep people from knowing they are AG or Pentecostal. They have the philosophy that people are more likely to attend a church that is not tied to a large fellowship or denomination. I believe this is inherently dishonest.

And, no, we shouldn’t rename the AG. “Assemblies of God” is just fine, and all our churches, while they don’t need to include it in their name, should make it clear they are Assemblies of God. If they don’t … then why are they (AG)?

Ken Horn

Read Full Post »